Salt Lake City–The University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law has launched a new early admissions process designed to give candidates who know the U is their top-choice law school a chance to commit to attending law school earlier than previously possible.Under the college’s newly established Early Decision Program (EDP), students can apply to attend law school for the fall of 2019 by Oct. 19 and be assured of decision on whether they will be admitted as an Early Decision Program student by early November.Applying to the Early Decision Program is a binding applications process and students who apply to the S.J. Quinney College of Law are committed to attending the law school once accepted. Students should carefully consider all law school options before making the decision to apply through the Early Decision Program.“This decision—establishing the S.J. Quinney College of Law as one’s first-choice law school—should be the result of fully researching law school options. If after investigating law schools and determining that S.J. Quinney College of Law is your first-choice law school, you may then wish to apply through the EDP,” said Reyes Aguilar, the law school’s associate dean for admission and financial aid.“The establishment of this program is meant to give top candidates who know they want to attend law school in Utah a sooner answer that there is a place for them here, so they can commit to their future as a law student at the S.J. Quinney College of Law,” he added.Applicants who are admitted under the Early Decision Program are automatically awarded a renewable merit-on-entrance scholarship package. Over a student’s three-year span at the S.J. Quinney College of Law, the value of the scholarship package for Utah residents is $50,000 (and for non-resident students the value is $75,000).The scholarship package will be disbursed in equal portions for each of the three years of a student’s enrollment at the law school. The only requirement to renew this scholarship is to maintain good academic and behavior code standing. Admitted Early Decision Program applicants may also be eligible for need-based scholarship support. That eligibility will be […]
Prof Kotey has suggested a reform in the country’s legal education A nominee for Supreme Court Justice, Prof Emmanuel Nii Ashie Kotey has told the Appointments Committee of Parliament that legal education in Ghana presently needs massive reforms otherwise there would be a point that the country will be producing lawyers who do not have any knowledge of the law.
He said currently legal education in Ghana is at the crossroads because to the best of his knowledge as a Professor in law some students with a degree in law who want to pursue masters programme in law do not even know what a lease is or what the requirements of a valid contract are.
“Legal education needs root to branch reforms. From accreditation of the Law Faculties, ” he said adding that if he had his own way he would recommend that all the law faculties in the universities would be disaccredited for them to reapply based on the quality of lecturers, classroom space, libraries and other important resources for effective training.
“Mr chairman, I was on an interview panel interviewing students with a degree in law, that is LLB, who want to do masters programme in law and you would be surprised to know that some of the students could not tell what a lease is, the requirements of a valid contract. When we asked one student to discuss a single case of constitutional law he could not, I then asked about the 31st December case which he retorted ‘Is it the 31st December Women Movement?”.
He said the matter is so serious that if care is not taken the nation will be producing lawyers who do not know any law.
When asked about his view on suggestions that the Ghana School of Law must have campuses in all public universities with Law Faculties, he said that since the matter is at the Supreme Court it will be prejudicial to comment on it.
When Prof Kotey who was the former Dean of the University of Ghana Law Faculty and who has extensive legal knowledge on land administration was asked by a member of […]
No, not the class you sit in. This column is devoted to socio-economic status, or “class.”
As I reported last week , the citation count rankings have a paucity of women, people of color, and people who didn’t go to a top 10 law school (and more likely to be from a lower socio-economic status). I had no idea that this would be a controversial proposition that the legal academy has some hierarchies that are perpetuated through its echo chamber of rankings.
The citation count rankings made me wonder about the path to getting into law school. So it was fortuitous that I found an interesting discussion by Brookings : It reports that states that compelled students to take the SAT or ACT “discovered” college-ready students of lower socio-economic status. And then Anthony Kreis (a person I’d love to have as a colleague at my school) tweeted this chart to me in the NY Times that shows some astonishing disparities based on class. This is something that schools like Yale and Harvard already know.
But that’s undergrad: How easy is it for a person of lower socioeconomic status to be accepted into and succeed in a top 10 law school? How easy is it for them to become law professors?
Let’s start with what some call “history.” Richard Sander wrote an excellent article in the Denver Law Review titled “ Class In American Legal Education .” His conclusions were troubling. To be a law student essentially meant coming from privilege, with rare exception. Or, in his words: “The vast majority of American law students come from relatively elite backgrounds; this is especially true at the most prestigious law schools, where only five percent of all students come from families whose SES is in the bottom half of the national distribution. ”
Of course, the usual route to be a law professor is to first graduate from law school. And if you want to publish in the top 10 law reviews or be well cited, a top law school. According to my perusal of Sisk et. al.’s study of most cited legal scholars, none of […]
As it continues to raise its profile, the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State Universit y is attracting elite students from all across the country.
The No. 8 public law school, according to U.S. News & World Report, consistently rates among the best in job placement and bar passage. ASU Law is welcoming a new class of students this fall from more than 40 different states. Download Full Image Although the common denominator is academic success — the incoming class boasts the highest grade-point average and average LSAT score in the school’s history — their backgrounds and interests are as varied as their geography.
“If you’re a highly motivated student who’s passionate about the law, we don’t care where you’re from — you are welcome here,” said ASU Law Dean Douglas Sylvester. “We have always taken pride in the diverse backgrounds and accomplishments of our student body and believe it is an essential element to the education and experience we offer at ASU Law.”
Three members of the new fall class shared their thoughts on the divergent paths that brought them to ASU Law, and what they hope to accomplish. Christopher Senn Law-school student ready for takeoff
From a young age, Christopher Senn had dreams of becoming a lawyer.
“Growing up, I’ve always enjoyed debating,” said the 24-year-old native of Washington, D.C. “As superficial as that sounds — I know that’s not what law will really entail — but I always told myself that I wanted to be a lawyer growing up.”
But he enlisted in the Marines in 2011, and his career took a different flight path. Stationed in Cherry Point, North Carolina, Senn served as a pilot of drones, referred to in the military as unmanned aircraft systems. From there, he enrolled in Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, graduating in 2015 with a degree in aeronautics. He then got a job in Sierra Vista, Arizona, working for Raytheon, a major defense contractor and the world’s largest manufacturer of guided missiles, and simultaneously began a master’s degree program in unmanned systems at Embry-Riddle, becoming one of the first graduates of that particular […]
If you attend school full-time, you should be able to become a lawyer in seven years – four years as an undergraduate at a college or university, then three years in law school. There is no set requirement for an undergraduate course of study necessary to get into law school, but experts advise that you take courses that sharpen your critical thinking and writing skills. Popular majors are history, English and political science.
Note that some states, such as California , allow you to enter law school after only two years of undergraduate coursework.
Following graduation, you’ll take the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) and hopefully get a good-enough grade to be accepted by a law school. After graduating law school, you are a lawyer, but you need to sit for an exam administered by your state bar to earn a license allowing you to practice law in your state.
Private student loans can help pay for school after you hit federal limits. Compare student loan rates without affecting your credit score.
View Loan Options Costs of Legal Education
Your legal education begins in a four-year undergraduate program. The College Board reports that, for the 2016-2017 academic year, in-state colleges cost an average of $24,610 annually, whereas private college costs averaged $49,320. An undergraduate degree will cost somewhere between $100K and $200K on average, and even more if you attend an Ivy League school. Without a doubt, law school students have higher than average debt after graduation compared to the rest of the nation .
Once you graduate college, your next challenge is to get into law school and pay for it. U.S. News & World Report’s 2015-2016 survey of law schools provided the following snapshot of annual full-time costs such as tuition, fees, room and board, books and supplies, personal expenses and transportation: Lowest private school: Brigham Young University, $23,940
Average private school : $45,467
Highest private school : Columbia University, $62,700 Lowest public in-state school : University of North Dakota, $11,161 Average public in-state school : $25,890 Highest public in-state school : University of Virginia, $54,000 […]
The wide brim of Margaret Brown’s Edwardian-era hat rose as she recalled, at the request of attorney Philip Koelsch, her experience of being in a lifeboat as the luxury liner Titanic sank into the icy Atlantic ocean in the early morning hours of April 15, 1912.
Brown recounted that fateful night, one marked by chaos and half-empty lifeboats, as she sat in the witness chair in a Mayborn Museum auditorium serving this week as courtroom.
Then came a cross-examination by Mike Hartnett, who sought to shift jurors’ attention from her action in the disaster that cost about 1,500 lives to an admission that, maybe, just maybe, her view of confusion and lifeboat operation that night might be a limited one, and not the whole picture of what was happening.
Brown, of course, was not the real Margaret "Molly" Brown, who died in 1932, but Waco actress Cathy Hawes. Attorneys Koelsch and Hartnett are third-year Baylor University Law School students taking part in this week’s "Titanic On Trial." The trial’s robed presiding judge, Gerald Powell, is a law professor who teaches the school’s Practice Court.
The trial at hand, a civil liabilities case, pitted Titanic survivor Madeleine Astor and Esther Hart, whose husbands died in the ship’s sinking, against White Star Line ship company owner International Mercantile Marine Co. and the Titanic’s builder, Harland & Wolff.
The legal action never happened but is a fictitious Practice Court case that became this week’s publicly viewed example not so much of living history but living jurisprudence.
The Mayborn Museum’s current touring exhibit, "Titanic: The Artifact Exhibition," provided an opportunity for the law school and museum to collaborate on a mock trial that offers a different angle to the 1912 passenger ship sinking that has captured the public’s imagination ever since: Namely, whose fault, legally speaking, was it?
The Titanic case, a fictitious one but built from actual testimony at both U.S. Senate and British Board of Trade hearings, was part of the Practice Court case rotation for about 10 years, but had been retired for some time because of the number of students needed and some 1,000 pages of […]
The Higher Education Commission (HEC) has directed the public and private sector universities and valid affiliated law colleges to ask students that a Law Admission Test (LAT) would be mandatory for getting admission in LLB five-year’s degree programme.
ISLAMABAD, (UrduPoint / Pakistan Point News – 28th Jun, 2018 ) :The Higher Education Commission ( HEC ) has directed the public and private sector universities and valid affiliated law colleges to ask students that a Law Admission Test (LAT) would be mandatory for getting admission in LLB five-year’s degree programme.
An official of the HEC told APP that the test would be held twice a year and it will be conducted free of cost by the Higher Education Commission . The decision has been taken by the HEC as per the order of apex court , he added. In this regard, an advertisement has been published on the HEC website, according to which the date of test would be announced in national newspapers and on HEC websites, the official told. The applicants may select any test centre from the available centre on HEC websites. However, for their own convenience, students are advised to choose test centre nearest to their residence.
The total marks of test would be 100 and the students having 50 marks would be considered pass. The test would comprise of an English essay, personal statements either in English or Urdu, MCQs of General knowledge, Islamic studies, Pak studies, English, Urdu and Mathematics.
The last date to apply for the test is July 10. The students having 12 years of schooling ( HSSC ) and those waiting for results would be eligible to apply.
Aliff Fazelbhoy was not the typical grade A student. After getting mediocre marks in his graduate studies, Aliff paved a path into the legal sector. But how did he do it? With the legal industry being highly competitive, Aliff shares how self-belief mixed with sheer determination made him conquer the legal sphere.
What inspired and motivated you to take up law as a profession and what keeps you motivated?
Call it destiny or fate or chance. I am a great believer that destiny has a few things planned for all of us, but these plans need to be put into action and that is up to each individual.
As a 19 year old commerce graduate with rather poor marks, I had no clue what I would do in life other than join our family business and sell auto spare parts. A friend, also from a business family casually mentioned to me that he was enrolling in law as his dad told him it may help in the business. I had read a few books on high profile legal cases and business law was one of the few subjects during my graduate studies where I did well… That’s how I ended studying law at the Government Law College (GLC) in Mumbai.
That decision changed my life. Within the first month of attending law college, I knew I had found my calling and that there was no looking back.
My late grandfather was my inspiration. He was by all accounts a super solicitor who rarely lost a case. Unfortunately, he died a year before I was born. On a lighter note, my late mother was delighted when I took up law as she believed I was her father’s double to follow in his footsteps.
In September this year, I will complete 30 years as a lawyer and there has not been a day that I have been bored at work. The varied nature of work I do ensures this. That, and the simple “thank you” or “job well done” note that I often get from clients after a matter or a deal is closed […]
Judges voted 7 to 2 in favour of law societies denying accreditation to schools that discriminate against LGBTQ+ students
Trinity Western University has been involved in a number of legal disputes that stem from their implementation of a covenant agreement that is mandatory for students to sign. (Braden Klassen) On June 15, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in favour of the Law Society of B.C. and Ontario, confirming the society’s right to deny accreditation to Trinity Western University’s proposed law school due to its lack of accessibility for all students.
At the heart of the controversy is TWU’s mandatory community covenant. The covenant is a strict student code of conduct which includes abstaining from sex outside of heterosexual marriage. Many viewed this clause as discriminatory to LGBTQ+ students.
In its decision, the Supreme Court wrote that it’s “proportionate and reasonable” to limit religious rights in order to ensure open access for LGBTQ+ students. According to a CBC report , the majority judgement believed that the covenant would deter LGBTQ+ students from attending TWU’s proposed law school, and that the LGBTQ+ students who did attend would be at risk of harm.
“At the heart of the Supreme Court’s decision is a recognition of the responsibility of the Law Society to uphold the rights of all persons and to protect the public interest,” said Law Society President Miriam Kresivo in a press release.
According to Earl Phillips, the executive director of Trinity Western University’s proposed law school, the mood at the Langley-based university was somber following the decision.
“I think we’re all disappointed,” says Phillips. “And I think disappointment is the key word.”
Phillips says he’s dismayed by the “idea that diversity in Canada does not have room for a law school at a small Christian university that holds to traditional Christian values.”
He explains that there are a number of options which could be taken to change the community covenant. Before a decision is reached, however, he feels that TWU “as a community needs to take a good, long, hard look at everything.”“That’s what we’re in the process of doing,” he says.Phillips also acknowledges the hardships […]
Early morning arrangement ‘for one year only’, says elite Russell Grouper Durham University Law School is introducing 8am lectures for the first time this Autumn.
The elite Russell Grouper’s undergraduate intake for law this year is understood to be so large that it has been divided into two to be taught separately, with one cohort starting their day outside normal teaching hours. The timetable shake-up, according to reports, will also affect a small number of second year LLB-ers and students enrolled on courses at Durham’s Business School.
In an email seen by student news website Palatinate , Durham Law School’s director of undergraduate studies explained how “there is nothing we as a department can do about this” and that it “is beyond our control”. The early starts are a result of “the increased number of students and the pressure this puts on timetabling and rooms”, he added.
A spokesperson for Durham University told Legal Cheek : “The proposed 8am lectures form part of the university’s provisional teaching timetable for the academic year 2018/19. This is not final: it is only in place while students choose their modules. The final timetable will be published in September, after A-level confirmation, and once all returning students have registered for their modules.” They continued: “If agreed, this arrangement will be for one year only, until our new teaching and learning Centre opens, which will increase our teaching capacity by almost a third. Out of nearly 2,000 lectures scheduled each week, it is proposed that only four start at 8am. Of the four affected modules, each has only one lecture scheduled at 8am — the remainder of teaching activities take place within the university’s core teaching hours.” Durham’s decision to split its law intake comes just months after Legal Cheek revealed that seven universities took on more than 500 new law students last year. They are: Liverpool (590), Nottingham Trent (555), Essex (550), Leicester (515), The University of Law (510), Northumbria (505) and Leeds Beckett (500). Durham, by comparison, took on just 295.
According to Open University research, early start times for teenagers and young 20-somethings are […]